MEMORANDUM OF
AGREEMENT
#1911019429
between the
UNION PACIFIC RAILROAD COMPANY
for the territory
WESTERN REGION
(Oregon Division)
(Northwestern District)
(Salt Lake City – Granger/Butte – Huntington)
(Los Angeles – Salt Lake City)
(Feather River Division)
and the
BROTHERHOOD OF LOCOMOTIVE ENGINEERS
INSTRUCTION-EXAMINATION CLASSES-OPERATING RULES
The parties signatory hereto fully endorse adherence to the Operating Rules and recognize the importance of instruction and examination on such rules in order to ensure that employees complete their duties safely and efficiently.
ACCORDINGLY, in regard to Instruction and Examination classes on Operating Rules, the parties hereby agree to the following conditions:
NOTE: This includes employees who can attend classes immediately prior to or at the completion of their tour of duty, provided the employees have sufficient time under the Hours of Service Act.
NOTE: Thirty (30) days prior to the date of examination will be reviewed by Carrier to validate other available dates/times the employes could have attended an instruction – examination class.
NOTE: An employe’s re-examination will be the following day if practical. However, at the request of the employe such reexamination can be deferred up to seven (7) days during which time the employe will not be permitted to perform service nor will the employe be allowed any compensation.
UNION PACIFIC RAILROAD COMPANY
1416 DODGE STREET
OMAHA, NEBRASKA 68179-0001
Side Letter No. 1
Dear Mr. Stewart:
This refers to Memorandum of Agreement # 1911019429 which provides for an Agreement rule with respect to Instruction‑Examination classes on Operating Rules.
This Memorandum of Agreement provides for compensation for employees and has an effective date of November 1, 1994. In this regard, the Carrier has agreed that the conditions set forth in the aforementioned Memorandum of Agreement will be retroactively applied to January 1, 1994 in that all employees who have completed their Operating Rules examination prior to November 1, will be provided the benefits of this Agreement.
UNION PACIFIC RAILROAD COMPANY
1416 DODGE STREET
OMAHA, NE13RASKA 68179-0001
Side Letter No. 2
Dear Mr. Stewart:
This refers to Memorandum of Agreement # 19110l9429 which provides for an Agreement rule with respect to Instruction-Examination classes on Operating Rules, with specific reference to Item 7.
During negotiations on this Agreement, the parties spent an extensive amount of time discussing the elements of Item 7 and this Side Letter No. 2 sets forth Carrier’s position on this matter that being that unless your Organization can provide documented evidence as to the justifiable reason(s) an employe failed the examination, the Carrier intends to terminate this employee form all service with the Carrier. This Carrier does not believe that the employee should remain on the seniority roster as a result of the employees apparent refusal to pass the rules examination which obviously results in that employee’s inability to perform service with the Carrier.
Yours truly,
L. A. Lambert
General Director Labor Relations
UNION PACIFIC RAILROAD COMPANY
1416 DODGE STREET
OMAHA, NEBRASKA 68179-0001
Side Letter No. 3
Dear Mr. Stewart:
The following two (2) items of clarification are issued with respect to Memorandum of Agreement # 1911019429.
“Part 4 of Memorandum of Agreement #1911019429 states in pertinent part that employes will be given adequate advance notice of the available Instruction – Examination Classes and an employe must attempt to attend one of these classes during his/her off duty hours. In this regard, an employe who has been afforded advance notice of available instruction classes but was unable to attend any class during off duty hours due to his/her documented work schedule and who was accordingly required to take time off will be allowed pay for time lost with a minimum payment of four (4) hours. This holds true with example of a pool freight engineer who was advised weeks in advanced of scheduled dates for examination. That employee elected one, of the days for such examination and on that day, the employee was called for pool freight service. The employee obviously must be absent from the pool freight service for the examination and in that case, the employe will be paid for all lost time with a minimum payment of four (4) hours.”
***
“Part 6 of Memorandum of Agreement #1911019429 states in the ‘NOTE’ that a re-examination will be held the following day if practical. The ‘NOTE’ continues by providing that at the request of the employe, such rescheduling can be deferred up to seven (7) days but during this period of time the employe will not be permitted to perform service nor will compensation be allowed. In this regard, it is clearly understood that if an employe requests that the extension be deferred up to seven (7) days, but the Carrier is unable to accommodate the employe, the re-examination will be rescheduled at a later period of time with the employe permitted to resume active service with compensation. However, it is also understood that service and compensation of the employe will not be extended beyond one (1) year from the date shown on the employees rules card.”
Yours truly,
L. A. Lambert
General Director Labor Relations